netdev - Re: [PATCH 07/10] net: only allow paged fragments with the same destructor to be coalesced.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1334088690.2624.1.camel@bwh-desktop.uk.solarflarecom.com>
Date:	Tue, 10 Apr 2012 21:11:30 +0100
From:	Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
To:	Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@...rix.com>
CC:	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
	Wei Liu <wei.liu2@...rix.com>, <xen-devel@...ts.xen.org>,
	Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
	"Pekka Savola (ipv6)" <pekkas@...core.fi>,
	James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
	Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
	Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/10] net: only allow paged fragments with the same
 destructor to be coalesced.

Shouldn't this be folded into the previous change 'net: add support for
per-paged-fragment destructors'?  Maybe it doesn't matter since nothing
is setting a non-NULL fragment destructor yet.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html