netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next #2 28/39] natsemi: stop using net_device.{base

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAAAKZwvRvc=6qwainJAkHCUEme+PsFY-s0PWxj9tYXwSmBcYJA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 10 Apr 2012 16:39:31 -0700
From:	Tim Hockin <thockin@...kin.org>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	romieu@...zoreil.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next #2 28/39] natsemi: stop using net_device.{base_addr,
 irq}.

OK, so that addresses that concern. :)  Thanks.

Overall nothing in the CL stands out as bad, except for the IO vs MMIO
BAR thing, which I can not answer with certainty any more.

On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 4:30 PM, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> From: Tim Hockin <thockin@...kin.org>
> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 15:53:53 -0700
>
>> First, because I am not so involved any more, I can't say with
>> certainty that these fields of struct net_device are not needed.
>
> It's the whole basis of this patch set, and described neatly
> in his "00/39" posting.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html