[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F839E2C.20000@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 11:42:52 +0900
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To: Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
CC: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org, Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] cgroup: pass struct mem_cgroup instead of struct
cgroup to socket memcg
(2012/04/10 7:36), Glauber Costa wrote:
> The only reason cgroup was used, was to be consistent with the populate()
> interface. Now that we're getting rid of it, not only we no longer need
> it, but we also *can't* call it this way.
>
> Since we will no longer rely on populate(), this will be called from
> create(). During create, the association between struct mem_cgroup
> and struct cgroup does not yet exist, since cgroup internals hasn't
> yet initialized its bookkeeping. This means we would not be able
> to draw the memcg pointer from the cgroup pointer in these
> functions, which is highly undesirable.
>
> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
> CC: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
> CC: Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>
> CC: Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
> CC: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
> CC: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
Acked-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists