netdev - Re: [PATCH v18 14/15] x86: Enable HAVE_ARCH_SECCOMP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGXu5j+6kWpuNudi_43J1coK-fN5NTrev=ycYSmcbr+dFBJMFg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 12 Apr 2012 15:16:04 -0700
From:	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To:	Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-man@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, arnd@...db.de,
	davem@...emloft.net, hpa@...or.com, mingo@...hat.com,
	oleg@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, rdunlap@...otime.net,
	mcgrathr@...omium.org, tglx@...utronix.de, luto@....edu,
	eparis@...hat.com, serge.hallyn@...onical.com, djm@...drot.org,
	scarybeasts@...il.com, indan@....nu, pmoore@...hat.com,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, corbet@....net, eric.dumazet@...il.com,
	markus@...omium.org, coreyb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, jmorris@...ei.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v18 14/15] x86: Enable HAVE_ARCH_SECCOMP_FILTER

On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org> wrote:
> Enable support for seccomp filter on x86:
> - syscall_get_arch()
> - syscall_get_arguments()
> - syscall_rollback()
> - syscall_set_return_value()
> - SIGSYS siginfo_t support
> - secure_computing is called from a ptrace_event()-safe context
> - secure_computing return value is checked (see below).
>
> SECCOMP_RET_TRACE and SECCOMP_RET_TRAP may result in seccomp needing to
> skip a system call without killing the process.  This is done by
> returning a non-zero (-1) value from secure_computing.  This change
> makes x86 respect that return value.
>
> To ensure that minimal kernel code is exposed, a non-zero return value
> results in an immediate return to user space (with an invalid syscall
> number).
>
> Signed-off-by: Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>
> Reviewed-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>
> Acked-by: Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>

Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>

-- 
Kees Cook
ChromeOS Security
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html