netdev - Re: [PATCH] pppoatm: Fix excessive queue bloat

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20120413.132752.884451274918746880.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Fri, 13 Apr 2012 13:27:52 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	chas@....nrl.navy.mil
Cc:	dwmw2@...radead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, paulus@...ba.org,
	eric.dumazet@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pppoatm: Fix excessive queue bloat

From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 13:04:52 -0400 (EDT)

> From: chas williams - CONTRACTOR <chas@....nrl.navy.mil>
> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 10:26:12 -0400
> 
>> On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 21:53:57 +0200
>> David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org> wrote:
>> 
>>> Seriously, this gets *much* easier if we just ditch the checks against
>>> sk_sndbuf. We just wake up whenever decrementing ->inflight from zero.
>>> Can I?
>> 
>> i dont know.
> 
> Please do not take this discussion private, and off of the netdev list.
> 
> Now nobody else on the list can see your response and and reply to it.

My bad, you didn't do this, my apologies.

But for some reason your replies didn't show up in the patchwork
entry for this patch, maybe your email client fumbled up the Message-Ids
because that's what patchwork uses to match things up.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html