[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F8EC817.1040109@katalix.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 14:56:39 +0100
From: James Chapman <jchapman@...alix.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org, bcrl@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] l2tp: Introduce L2TPv3 IP encapsulation support
for IPv6
On 18/04/12 05:28, David Miller wrote:
> From: James Chapman <jchapman@...alix.com>
> Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 13:29:26 +0100
>
>> L2TPv3 defines an IP encapsulation packet format where data is carried
>> directly over IP (no UDP). The kernel already has support for L2TP IP
>> encapsulation over IPv4 (l2tp_ip). This patch introduces support for L2TP
>> IP encapsulation over IPv6.
>
> Either the ipv4 side should be changed to use ip4_datagram_connect()
> or the ipv6 side should duplicate just the parts of
> ip6_datagram_connect() it needs.
>
> Which is it? :-)
Ok, I'll add a patch to l2tp_ip to have it use ip4_datagram_connect(). :-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists