[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120417.225924.1599146568561338219.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 22:59:24 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: grantgrundler@...il.com
Cc: romieu@...zoreil.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] dmfe: enforce consistent timing delay.
From: Grant Grundler <grantgrundler@...il.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 14:45:38 -0700
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com> wrote:
>> The driver does not always use the same timing for what looks like
>> the same operations.
>>
>> - DCR0
>> Use the same udelay everywhere for reset. Upper bound is 100 us.
>> - DCR9
>> Use 5us delay for srom clock. 1us delay for phy_write_1bit (writes
>> PHY_DATA_[01]) are not changed as they stay withing a 2,5MHz MDIO
>> clock range.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>
>
>
> Reviewed-by: Grant Grundler <grundler@...isc-linux.org>
Applied, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists