netdev - Re: [PATCH] netns: do not leak net

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <m1wr5d3cyv.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org>
Date:	Tue, 17 Apr 2012 21:01:28 -0700
From:	ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To:	Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netns: do not leak net_generic data on failed init

Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg> writes:

> 	ops_init should free the net_generic data on
> init failure and __register_pernet_operations should not
> call ops_free when NET_NS is not enabled.

The subject is good.

There is most definitely a leak with us not freeing the net_generic data
on ops_init failure.  Having ops_init just take care of it seems like
the logical place as it makes for simple analysis.

The bit about __register_pernet_operations should not call ops_free when
NET_NS is not enabled is a bad comment.  We just need to move the
ops_free into ops_init on failure, which is what your patch does.

Without your patch the only caller of ops_init that doesn't leak today
is __register_pernet_operations in !CONFIG_NET_NS, precisely because
it does that ops_free.

Now all of that said I have just read through everything and
patch cleanly fixes a rare but real memory leak, and leaves
the code in better state then it is today.

David please apply this patch.

Reviewed-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>

> Signed-off-by: Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>
> ---
>  net/core/net_namespace.c |   33 ++++++++++++++++++---------------
>  1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/core/net_namespace.c b/net/core/net_namespace.c
> index 0e950fd..31a5ae5 100644
> --- a/net/core/net_namespace.c
> +++ b/net/core/net_namespace.c
> @@ -83,21 +83,29 @@ assign:
>  
>  static int ops_init(const struct pernet_operations *ops, struct net *net)
>  {
> -	int err;
> +	int err = -ENOMEM;
> +	void *data = NULL;
> +
>  	if (ops->id && ops->size) {
> -		void *data = kzalloc(ops->size, GFP_KERNEL);
> +		data = kzalloc(ops->size, GFP_KERNEL);
>  		if (!data)
> -			return -ENOMEM;
> +			goto out;
>  
>  		err = net_assign_generic(net, *ops->id, data);
> -		if (err) {
> -			kfree(data);
> -			return err;
> -		}
> +		if (err)
> +			goto cleanup;
>  	}
> +	err = 0;
>  	if (ops->init)
> -		return ops->init(net);
> -	return 0;
> +		err = ops->init(net);
> +	if (!err)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +cleanup:
> +	kfree(data);
> +
> +out:
> +	return err;
>  }
>  
>  static void ops_free(const struct pernet_operations *ops, struct net *net)
> @@ -448,12 +456,7 @@ static void __unregister_pernet_operations(struct pernet_operations *ops)
>  static int __register_pernet_operations(struct list_head *list,
>  					struct pernet_operations *ops)
>  {
> -	int err = 0;
> -	err = ops_init(ops, &init_net);
> -	if (err)
> -		ops_free(ops, &init_net);
> -	return err;
> -	
> +	return ops_init(ops, &init_net);
>  }
>  
>  static void __unregister_pernet_operations(struct pernet_operations *ops)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html