[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120419225322.GC10553@google.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 15:53:22 -0700
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>, kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, devel@...nvz.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] don't attach a task to a dead cgroup
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 07:49:16PM -0300, Glauber Costa wrote:
> Not all external callers of cgroup_attach_task() test to
> see if the cgroup is still live - the internal callers at
> cgroup.c does.
>
> With this test in cgroup_attach_task, we can assure that
> no tasks are ever moved to a cgroup that is past its
> destruction point and was already marked as dead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
> CC: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
> CC: Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>
> CC: Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
> ---
> kernel/cgroup.c | 3 +++
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/cgroup.c b/kernel/cgroup.c
> index b61b938..932c318 100644
> --- a/kernel/cgroup.c
> +++ b/kernel/cgroup.c
> @@ -1927,6 +1927,9 @@ int cgroup_attach_task(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct task_struct *tsk)
> struct cgroup_taskset tset = { };
> struct css_set *newcg;
>
> + if (cgroup_is_removed(cgrp))
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
Isn't the test in cgroup_lock_live_group() enough?
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists