[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F8FB0E3.4000300@st.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 08:29:55 +0200
From: Giuseppe CAVALLARO <peppe.cavallaro@...com>
To: Viresh KUMAR <viresh.kumar@...com>
Cc: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
spear-devel <spear-devel@...t.st.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next 3/4] stmmac: verify the dma_cfg platform fields
On 4/19/2012 8:05 AM, Viresh KUMAR wrote:
> On 4/19/2012 11:18 AM, Giuseppe CAVALLARO wrote:
>> Recently the dma parameters that can be passed from the platform
>> have been moved from the plat_stmmacenet_data to the stmmac_dma_cfg.
>>
>> In case of this new structure is not well allocated the driver can
>> fails. This is an example how this field is managed in ST platforms
>>
>> static struct stmmac_dma_cfg gmac_dma_setting = {
>> .pbl = 32,
>> };
>>
>> static struct plat_stmmacenet_data stih415_ethernet_platform_data[] = {
>> {
>> .dma_cfg = &gmac_dma_setting,
>> .has_gmac = 1,
>> [snip]
>>
>> This patch so verifies that the dma_cfg passed from the platform.
>> In case of it is NULL there is no reason that the driver has to fail
>> and some default values can be passed. These are ok for all the
>> Synopsys chips and could impact on performances, only.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>
>> cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...com>
>
> I really can't review it, as i am not stmmac expert. But, i am sure
> the problem i highlighted will be resolved by this patch.
>
> Another thing, as SPEAr is using stmmac, can you always cc spear-devel@...t.st.com
> for all stmmac patches.
Yes! I have forgotten to add spear guys ;-)
Thanks for your feedbak
Peppe
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists