netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] tcp: avoid expensive pskb_expand

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1334841481.2395.175.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date:	Thu, 19 Apr 2012 15:18:01 +0200
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi>
Cc:	Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>,
	Maciej Żenczykowski <maze@...gle.com>,
	Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] tcp: avoid expensive pskb_expand_head()
 calls

On Thu, 2012-04-19 at 13:30 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:

> I'll provide a v3 anyway with more performance data, I setup two cards
> in PCI x8 slots to get full bandwidth.

Incidentally, using PCI x8 slots dont anymore trigger the slow path on
unpatched kernel and a single flow (~9410 Mbits)

It seems we are lucky enough to TX complete sent clones before trying to
tcp_trim_head() when processing ACK

Sounds like a timing issue, and fact that drivers batches TX completions
and RX completions.

Also BQL might have changed things a bit here (ixgbe is BQL enabled)

Only if I start several concurrent flows I see the pskb_expand_head()
overhead.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html