[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F91D5A2.2060300@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 14:31:14 -0700
From: John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@...el.com>
To: Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>,
Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>
CC: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, gospo@...hat.com, sassmann@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [net-next 04/14] net: Fix issue with netdev_tx_reset_queue not
resetting queue from XOFF state
On 4/20/2012 2:19 PM, Tom Herbert wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
>
>> @@ -3244,7 +3246,6 @@ static void igb_clean_tx_ring(struct igb_ring *tx_ring)
>> buffer_info = &tx_ring->tx_buffer_info[i];
>> igb_unmap_and_free_tx_resource(tx_ring, buffer_info);
>> }
>> - netdev_tx_reset_queue(txring_txq(tx_ring));
>>
> Why is it necessary to remove this? If rings are being freed with
> going through completion path then we would need this reset. Is this
> being done elsewhere maybe?
>
Alex moved this into the igb_configure_tx_ring() iirc to catch an ethtool
test case. He assured me when I reviewed the patch that igb_configure_tx_ring()
would always be called before netif_carrier_on() so I think(?) that should
be OK.
The above removed case was called after netif_carrier_off() anyways.
> Tom
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists