[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F917B3B.1060704@parallels.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 12:05:31 -0300
From: Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>,
<kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, <devel@...nvz.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] don't attach a task to a dead cgroup
On 04/19/2012 07:53 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 07:49:16PM -0300, Glauber Costa wrote:
>> Not all external callers of cgroup_attach_task() test to
>> see if the cgroup is still live - the internal callers at
>> cgroup.c does.
>>
>> With this test in cgroup_attach_task, we can assure that
>> no tasks are ever moved to a cgroup that is past its
>> destruction point and was already marked as dead.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa<glommer@...allels.com>
>> CC: Tejun Heo<tj@...nel.org>
>> CC: Li Zefan<lizefan@...wei.com>
>> CC: Kamezawa Hiroyuki<kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
>> ---
>> kernel/cgroup.c | 3 +++
>> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/cgroup.c b/kernel/cgroup.c
>> index b61b938..932c318 100644
>> --- a/kernel/cgroup.c
>> +++ b/kernel/cgroup.c
>> @@ -1927,6 +1927,9 @@ int cgroup_attach_task(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct task_struct *tsk)
>> struct cgroup_taskset tset = { };
>> struct css_set *newcg;
>>
>> + if (cgroup_is_removed(cgrp))
>> + return -ENODEV;
>> +
>
> Isn't the test in cgroup_lock_live_group() enough?
>
Yes, when it is done.
Not all callers take it, specially the external ones.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists