[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120421.161032.2225288178918492428.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 16:10:32 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: david.ward@...mit.edu
Cc: tgraf@...g.ch, eric.dumazet@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: net_sched: gred: red_calc_qavg() called with current qavg for
backlog?
From: "Ward, David - 0663 - MITLL" <david.ward@...mit.edu>
Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 14:46:31 -0400
> In net/sched/sch_gred.c:
>
> static int gred_dump(struct Qdisc *sch, struct sk_buff *skb)
> {
> struct gred_sched *table = qdisc_priv(sch);
> ...
> for (i = 0; i < MAX_DPs; i++) {
> struct gred_sched_data *q = table->tab[i];
> struct tc_gred_qopt opt;
> ...
> opt.qave = red_calc_qavg(&q->parms, &q->vars, q->vars.qavg);
>
>
> I can't tell if red_calc_qavg is intentionally being passed the current
> qavg as the backlog (which effectively causes qavg to only be
> re-calculated if we are idling)? Or should this be:
>
> opt.qave = red_calc_qavg(&q->parms,
> &q->vars,
> gred_backlog(table, q, sch));
Looking at commit 22b33429ab93155895854e9518a253680a920493
("[PKT_SCHED]: GRED: Use new generic red interface") it appears
that this line is intentional so that the dump reports the same
qave as it would have before Thomas's changes.
Thomas?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists