lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sun, 22 Apr 2012 23:38:38 +0900
From:	Tetsuo Handa <>
Subject: Re: Question with secure_ipv4_port_ephemeral() implementation

Ben Hutchings wrote:
> All this randomisation is concerned with preventing spoofing attacks by
> attackers that can't see any packets routed to the spoofed address.  If
> they can see the return packets then this is all in vain, which is why
> we generally want cryptography at the transport or application level.
> But if they can't then the port offset remains secret - right?
> (Port randomisation is not very useful on it own due to the small number
> space, but see
> <>.)

Thank you. So, this change (which looked to me a regression) is not a regression.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists