lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 16:13:13 -0400 (EDT) From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> To: jesse@...ira.com Cc: shemminger@...tta.com, horms@...ge.net.au, jhs@...atatu.com, stephen.hemminger@...tta.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, dev@...nvswitch.org, eric.dumazet@...il.com Subject: Re: [RFC v4] Add TCP encap_rcv hook (repost) From: Jesse Gross <jesse@...ira.com> Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 13:08:49 -0700 > Assuming that the TCP stack generates large TSO frames on transmit > (which could be the local stack; something sent by a VM; or packets > received, coalesced by GRO and then encapsulated by STT) then you can > just prepend the STT header (possibly slightly adjusting things like > requested MSS, number of segments, etc. slightly). After that it's > possible to just output the resulting frame through the IP stack like > all tunnels do today. Which seems to potentially suggest a stronger intergration of the STT tunnel transmit path into our IP stack rather than the approach Simon is taking -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists