[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F94BE95.8030508@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 10:29:41 +0800
From: Gao feng <gaofeng@...fujitsu.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
CC: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>, pablo@...filter.org,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 05/19] net: Move all of the network sysctls without
a namespace into init_net.
于 2012年04月23日 09:50, Eric W. Biederman 写道:
> Gao feng <gaofeng@...fujitsu.com> writes:
>
>> 于 2012年04月20日 07:24, Eric W. Biederman 写道:
>>>
>>> This makes it clearer which sysctls are relative to your current network
>>> namespace.
>>>
>>> This makes it a little less error prone by not exposing sysctls for the
>>> initial network namespace in other namespaces.
>>>
>>> This is the same way we handle all of our other network interfaces to
>>> userspace and I can't honestly remember why we didn't do this for
>>> sysctls right from the start.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/infiniband/core/ucma.c | 4 ++--
>>> net/802/tr.c | 2 +-
>>> net/appletalk/sysctl_net_atalk.c | 4 ++--
>>> net/ax25/sysctl_net_ax25.c | 4 ++--
>>> net/bridge/br_netfilter.c | 4 ++--
>>> net/core/neighbour.c | 2 +-
>>> net/core/sysctl_net_core.c | 2 +-
>>> net/dccp/sysctl.c | 4 ++--
>>> net/decnet/dn_dev.c | 4 ++--
>>> net/decnet/sysctl_net_decnet.c | 4 ++--
>>> net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_queue.c | 6 +++---
>>> net/ipv4/route.c | 2 +-
>>> net/ipv4/sysctl_net_ipv4.c | 4 ++--
>>> net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6_queue.c | 6 +++---
>>> net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_conntrack_reasm.c | 4 ++--
>>> net/ipv6/sysctl_net_ipv6.c | 2 +-
>>> net/ipx/sysctl_net_ipx.c | 5 +++--
>>> net/irda/irsysctl.c | 4 ++--
>>> net/llc/sysctl_net_llc.c | 5 +++--
>>> net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto.c | 4 ++--
>>
>> Hi Eric
>>
>> actually,I'm working on making the sysctl and data of nf_conntrack proto pernet,
>> and I think it's necessary,without the pernet proto timeout,we can't control
>> the container's conntrack timeout unless we change the host's timeout.
>>
>> maybe somebody want the conntracks in container expired quickly.
>> So I will keep on doing this job base on your patchset.
>>
>> what's your comment?
>
> My quick skim of your patches suggested to me you are doing useful work.
>
> Making sysctls that are not pernet init_net only serve two
> purposes.
> - Prevent mistakes by changing a sysctl you think is pernet but globally
> affects the networking stack.
> - Make it easy to find which sysctls need to be converted.
OK,I got it.
>
> I suspect a lot of sysctls have not been converted simply because no one
> realized they had not been converted.
>
> I hope my code cleanup did not set you back very much. I don't believe
> there were any conflicts in principle just a few places where we touched
> the same code.
Yes,just a little of codes,Thanks for your comments.
Thanks,
Gao
>
> Eric
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists