[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120424191934.37755018@asterix.rh>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 19:19:34 -0300
From: Flavio Leitner <fbl@...hat.com>
To: David Stevens <dlstevens@...ibm.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, herbert@...dor.hengli.com.au,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: restoring IP multicast addresses when restarting the interface.
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 14:28:33 -0700
David Stevens <dlstevens@...ibm.com> wrote:
> netdev-owner@...r.kernel.org wrote on 04/24/2012 02:00:04 PM:
>
> > From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
>
> > >> I don't see why they should disappear when the interface goes
> > >> down and then comes back up since these ultimately come from
> > >> application sockets which continue to exist after a down/up.
> > >
> > > Yeah, but that's not how things used to work before, so my
> > > question is if the kernel should be responsible for keeping
> > > the subscription or the application.
> > >
> > > If the admin puts down the interface and remove the module,
> > > for instance, then the multicast subscription is gone.
> > > Should the application monitor for that then?
> > >
> > > David? Any thoughts?
> >
> > David Stevens at IBM and Herbert at the current multicast
> > experts, so I will defer to them.
>
> I think restoring the hardware multicast filter on device up
> is useful, desirable and not a bug. :-)
Alright, thanks everyone!
fbl
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists