netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] ipv6: RTAX_FEATURE_ALLFRAG causes inefficient TCP segment sizing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1335348929.3274.33.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date:	Wed, 25 Apr 2012 12:15:29 +0200
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Tore Anderson <tore@....no>
Cc:	Maciej Żenczykowski <maze@...gle.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] ipv6: RTAX_FEATURE_ALLFRAG causes inefficient
 TCP segment sizing

On Wed, 2012-04-25 at 12:04 +0200, Tore Anderson wrote:

> 
> Also, I'm not really sure if the IPv4 minimum PMTU is defined as 576 or
> 68 bytes. There are some conflicting information out there, and nothing 
> really
> authoritative either way (that I've found at least).

576 certainly not.

68 seems to be allowed



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html