netdev - Re: [PATCH 0/5][6lowpan] several fixes for 6lowpan

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20120425.203554.1187346578559639487.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Wed, 25 Apr 2012 20:35:54 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	alex.bluesman.smirnov@...il.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-zigbee-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5][6lowpan] several fixes for 6lowpan

From: Alexander Smirnov <alex.bluesman.smirnov@...il.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 14:51:06 +0400

> the following patch-set contains several fixes/improvements for 6lowpan:
> 1. fix: segmentation fault caused by mlme request
> 2. impr: move frame allocation code to a separate function
> 3. fix: clean up fragments list if module unloaded
> 4. impr: duplicate definition of IEEE802154_ALEN
> 5. fix: add missing spin_lock_init()
> 
> Could you please review them?

You need to not mix bug fixe patches with one which perform
cleanups and code refactoring.

Submit the pure bug fixes as one set, against the 'net' tree.

Then submit the rest as another set, against the 'net-next' tree.

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html