[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120426090520.GA5801@verge.net.au>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 18:05:20 +0900
From: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
Cc: Hans Schillstrom <hans.schillstrom@...csson.com>, ja@....bg,
wensong@...ux-vs.org, rohara@...hat.com, lvs-devel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
hans@...illstrom.com
Subject: Re: [v2 PATCH 1/1] ipvs: kernel oops - do_ip_vs_get_ctl
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 10:10:41AM +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-04-26 at 07:47 +0200, Hans Schillstrom wrote:
> > Change order of init so netns init is ready
> > when register ioctl and netlink.
> >
> > Ver2
> > Whitespace fixes and __init added.
> >
> > Reported-by: "Ryan O'Hara" <rohara@...hat.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Hans Schillstrom <hans.schillstrom@...csson.com>
>
> Looks good, interdiff says you fixed up things, and I have tested it
> against the net tree, good work :-)
>
> Is this a stable tree candidate?
Yes, I think so.
I now have the following 7 changes in my ipvs tree on kernel.org.
The last two are already in Pablo's net tree and I intend
to send a pull request for the remaining 5 soon.
It is my opinion that all 7 patches are stable tree material.
ipvs: kernel oops - do_ip_vs_get_ctl
ipvs: take care of return value from protocol init_netns
ipvs: null check of net->ipvs in lblc(r) shedulers
ipvs: reset ipvs pointer in netns
ipvs: add check in ftp for initialized core
ipvs: fix crash in ip_vs_control_net_cleanup on unload
ipvs: Verify that IP_VS protocol has been registered
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists