netdev - Re: [PATCH] tcp repair: Fix unaligned access when repairing options (v2)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20120426.052336.664675835426476301.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Thu, 26 Apr 2012 05:23:36 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	xemul@...allels.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, David.Laight@...LAB.COM
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tcp repair: Fix unaligned access when repairing
 options (v2)

From: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 12:50:57 +0400

> Don't pick __u8/__u16 values directly from raw pointers, but instead use
> an array of structures of code:value pairs. This is OK, since the buffer
> we take options from is not an skb memory, but a user-to-kernel one.
> 
> For those options which don't require any value now, require this to be
> zero (for potential future extension of this API).
> 
> v2: Changed tcp_repair_opt to use two __u32-s as spotted by David Laight.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>

Hmmm, this didn't show up on netdev, I wonder why?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html