| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <4F991E6D.4020303@atmel.com> Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 12:07:41 +0200 From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com> To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <avictor.za@...il.com>, <plagnioj@...osoft.com> Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] net/at91: at91_ether fixes for 3.4-rc On 04/26/2012 11:20 AM, David Miller : > From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com> > Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 11:14:56 +0200 > >> Can you please pull those fixes for 3.4-rc? The ARM/AT91 part >> of modifications is pretty small and bounded to a single SoC so >> it will not mess with arm-soc git tree. > > Please post the patches themselves to netdev. > > You can give me pull requests, but those go into the "[PATCH 0/N] ..." > email, it doesn't preclude you're still having to post the actual > patches. > > Otherwise nobody can review your work. Both patches have been posted on netdev (but independently): First has been posted on February 13th: http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg188868.html With a question from myself a few days ago: http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg196183.html And I can find ancestors back in May 2011... Second one has been posted on April 23rd: http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg196002.html So, should I repost both of them as patch series? Best regards, -- Nicolas Ferre -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists