netdev - Re: [PATCH] IPVS: ip_vs_ftp.c: local functions should not be exposed globally

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120427010140.GD5105@verge.net.au>
Date:	Fri, 27 Apr 2012 10:01:40 +0900
From:	Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
To:	H Hartley Sweeten <hartleys@...ionengravers.com>
Cc:	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IPVS: ip_vs_ftp.c: local functions should not be exposed
 globally

On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 11:17:28AM -0700, H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
> Functions not referenced outside of a source file should be marked
> static to prevent it from being exposed globally.
> 
> This quiets the sparse warnings:
> 
> warning: symbol 'ip_vs_ftp_init' was not declared. Should it be static?

On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 11:26:15AM -0700, H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
> Functions not referenced outside of a source file should be marked
> static to prevent it from being exposed globally.
> 
> This quiets the sparse warnings:
> 
> warning: symbol '__ipvs_proto_data_get' was not declared. Should it be static?
> 
> Signed-off-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@...ionengravers.com>
> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>

Thanks, I have applied these to ipvs-next.

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/horms/ipvs-next.git
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html