netdev - Re: [PATCH] 9p: disconnect channel when PCI device is removed

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+1xoqekMH0yeGTu=2bsfJ8gcyARtX9MU3Z6A_q51q_dXxNbNw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sun, 29 Apr 2012 05:21:27 +0200
From:	Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>
To:	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	davem@...emloft.net, ericvh@...il.com, jvrao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	rusty@...tcorp.com.au, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, davej@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 9p: disconnect channel when PCI device is removed

On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 8:16 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V
<aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com> writes:
>
>> On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V
>> <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>>> Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V
>>>> <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>>>>> Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com> writes:
>>>>>
>>>>>> When a virtio_9p pci device is being removed, we should close down any
>>>>>> active channels and free up resources, we're not supposed to BUG() if there's
>>>>>> still an open channel since it's a valid case when removing the PCI device.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Otherwise, removing the PCI device with an open channel would cause the
>>>>>> following BUG():
>>>>>>
>>>>> ...
>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/net/9p/trans_virtio.c b/net/9p/trans_virtio.c
>>>>>> index 3d43206..5af18d1 100644
>>>>>> --- a/net/9p/trans_virtio.c
>>>>>> +++ b/net/9p/trans_virtio.c
>>>>>> @@ -615,7 +615,8 @@ static void p9_virtio_remove(struct virtio_device *vdev)
>>>>>>  {
>>>>>>       struct virtio_chan *chan = vdev->priv;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -     BUG_ON(chan->inuse);
>>>>>> +     if (chan->inuse)
>>>>>> +             p9_virtio_close(chan->client);
>>>>>>       vdev->config->del_vqs(vdev);
>>>>>>
>>>>>>       mutex_lock(&virtio_9p_lock);
>>>>>
>>>>> But an umount should have resulted in p9_virtio_close ? How are you
>>>>> removing the device ? Are you removing the device with file system
>>>>> mounted  ?. In that case may be we should return EBUSY ?
>>>>
>>>> I signal the underlying PCI device to remove (echo 1 >
>>>> /sys/devices/pci0000\:00/[...]/remove), we can't really prevent that
>>>> thing so we must clean up ourselves.
>>>
>>> What does that mean for the mounted file system ? What would happen to
>>> the pending fs operations in that case ?
>>
>> I'm guessing that all of them should be canceled.
>
> Pending operation we can cancel, but what about dirty pages in cached
> mode ? Also how does virtio-blk handle this ?

virtio-blk does pretty much the same thing:

sh-4.2# echo 1 > 0000\:00\:05.0/remove
sh-4.2# ls -al
[hang]

>> virtio-pci simulates
>> a PCI device, if the PCI device is unplugged there's not much to do
>> about the filesystem or pending requests.
>
> Ideal thing to do would be to make remove return -EBUSY; let the user
> umount. But looking at the code, I guess there is no easy way to return
> error from remove callback ?

There's no way to return error, the removal callback is just a notifier.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html