[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1335753820.20866.27.camel@pasglop>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 12:43:40 +1000
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: kaffeemonster@...glemail.com, eric.dumazet@...il.com,
matt@...abs.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION][PATCH V4 3/3] bpf jit: Let the powerpc jit handle
negative offsets
On Wed, 2012-04-04 at 08:11 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-04-03 at 18:03 -0400, David Miller wrote:
>
> > > Signed-off-by: Jan Seiffert <kaffeemonster@...glemail.com>
> > >
> > > I have only compile tested this, -ENOHARDWARE.
> > > Can someone with more powerpc kung-fu review and maybe test this?
> > > Esp. powerpc asm is not my strong point. I think i botched the
> > > stack frame in the call setup. Help?
> >
> > I'm not applying this until a powerpc person tests it.
> >
> > Also, we have an ARM JIT in the tree which probably needs to
> > be fixed similarly.
>
> Matt's having a look at powerpc
Ok, he hasn't so I'll dig a bit.
No obvious wrongness (but I'm not very familiar with bpf), though I do
have a comment: sk_negative_common() and bpf_slow_path_common() should
be made one and single macro which takes the fallback function as an
argument.
I'll mess around & try to test using Jan test case & will come back
with an updated patch.
Cheers,
Ben.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists