[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACVXFVPzZF1BTN+0frDh5EyQnpAvkPSbMEAhWmUw2OgaTEwF1g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 16:13:40 +0800
From: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, huajun.li.lee@...il.com,
oneukum@...e.de, stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usbnet: fix skb traversing races during unlink
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 10:18 AM, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> From: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>
> Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 18:21:35 +0800
>
>> +/*The caller must hold list->lock*/
>
> Please put spaces in your comments, like this:
>
> /* The caller must hold list->lock */
>
>> +
>> + /*speedup unlink by blocking resubmit*/
>
> Same here.
OK, will do it.
>>
>> - entry = (struct skb_data *) skb->cb;
>> + skb_queue_walk(q, skb) {
>> + entry = (struct skb_data *) skb->cb;
>> + if (entry->state != unlink_start)
>> + break;
>> + }
>> + if (skb == (struct sk_buff *)q)
>> + break;
>
> Please do not expose the internal details of SKB lists
> with a test like this. Eventually this will all be
> converted to struct list_head and this kind of test
> will cause unnecessary pain for such a conversion.
>
> Instead, code it like this, as you would for a loop
> using list_for_each*() or similar:
>
> skb_queue_walk(q, skb) {
> if (condition)
> goto found;
> }
> /* No matching entry. */
> break;
> found:
Good suggestion, will do it.
Thanks,
--
Ming Lei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists