netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 5/5] be2net: Fix to allow set/get of debug levels in the Firmware.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 30 Apr 2012 15:13:22 +0100
From:	Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
To:	Somnath Kotur <somnath.kotur@...lex.com>
CC:	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Suresh Reddy <Suresh.Reddy@...lex.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 5/5] be2net: Fix to allow set/get of debug
 levels in the Firmware.

On Mon, 2012-04-30 at 11:35 +0530, Somnath Kotur wrote:
> Suggested-by: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>

No, not really.

> Signed-off-by: Suresh Reddy <Suresh.Reddy@...lex.com>
> Signed-off-by: Somnath Kotur <somnath.kotur@...lex.com>
[...]
> +static void be_set_msglevel(struct net_device *netdev, u32 data)
> +{
> +	struct be_adapter *adapter = netdev_priv(netdev);
> +	struct be_dma_mem extfat_cmd;
> +	struct be_fat_conf_params *cfgs;
> +	int status;
> +	int i, j;
> +
> +	if (lancer_chip(adapter)) {
> +		dev_err(&adapter->pdev->dev, "Operation not supported\n");
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +	switch (data) {
> +	case TRACE_LEVEL_ALL:
> +	case TRACE_LEVEL_ENTER_FUNCTION:
> +	case TRACE_LEVEL_VERBOSE:
> +	case TRACE_LEVEL_INFO:
> +	case TRACE_LEVEL_TEST:
> +	case TRACE_LEVEL_SHOW:
> +	case TRACE_LEVEL_WARNING:
> +	case TRACE_LEVEL_ERROR:
> +	case TRACE_LEVEL_FATAL:
> +	case TRACE_LEVEL_ALWAYS:
> +	case TRACE_LEVEL_DISABLED:
> +		break;
> +	default:
> +		dev_err(&adapter->pdev->dev, "Invalid message level value\n");
> +		return;
> +	}
[...]

So far as I'm concerned, the message 'level' should be a msg_enable
bitmask as used by the 'netif' logging functions.  This convention
hasn't been consistently implemented in existing drivers and still isn't
documented in <linux/ethtool.h>.  But the ethtool utility interprets it
according to this convention, and that was commented as being intended
since at least 2005 (beginning of git history).

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html