[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F9EC3D7.1090906@hp.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 09:54:47 -0700
From: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
CC: Shirley Ma <mashirle@...ibm.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, eric.dumazet@...il.com,
avi@...hat.com, arnd@...db.de, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: getting host CPU utilization (was Re: [PATCH V7 2/4 net-next]
skbuff: Add userspace zero-copy buffers in skb)
On 04/30/2012 02:12 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 10:19:48AM -0700, Rick Jones wrote:
>> one of these days I'll have to find a good way to get accurate
>> overall CPU utilization from within a guest and teach netperf about
>> it.
>
> I think the cleanest way would be to run another netperf server on the
> host. netperf would get a flag with host address and get cpu
> utilization info.
>
> This is what we currently do manually: run mpstat on the host.
>
> Thoughts?
I might be able to enhance the LOC_CPU/REM_CPU calibration tests to be
bona fide CPU utilization tests.
> By the way, could you point me to code used by netperf
> to measure CPU utilization on Linux? I'd like to figure
> out why isn't the result always consistent with e.g. mpstat.
That would be src/netcpu_procstat.c . That code is automagically
selected by the configure script when it determines the compilation is
happening under Linux. You can, if you wish, manually set it though I
suspect the only other mechanism known to netperf that would function
under Linux is the "looper" (aka CPU soaker) method.
rick
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists