[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1335912148.2656.11.camel@jtkirshe-mobl>
Date: Tue, 01 May 2012 15:42:28 -0700
From: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
To: Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, john.r.fastabend@...el.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
therbert@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] e1000e tx queue timeout in 3.3.0 (bisected to BQL
support for e1000e)
On Tue, 2012-05-01 at 15:08 -0700, Ben Greear wrote:
> On 05/01/2012 02:49 PM, David Miller wrote:
> > From: Ben Greear<greearb@...delatech.com>
> > Date: Tue, 01 May 2012 14:10:43 -0700
> >
> >> On 04/20/2012 02:56 PM, Ben Greear wrote:
> >>> On 04/20/2012 02:21 PM, Tom Herbert wrote:
> >>>> Thanks John for pointers to those. Ben, are you running a kernel
> with
> >>>> these patches?
> >>>
> >>> I just tested this on my e1000e and igb machine. With these
> patches,
> >>> I can no longer reproduce the problem.
> >>>
> >>> So, please make sure those are queued up for 3.3 stable!
> >>
> >> Dave: I think these patches below should go to 3.3 stable.
> >>
> >> They are not queued for stable yet as far as I can tell.
> >
> > I let the Intel developers handle -stable submissions for their
> > drivers.
>
> I don't think this is specific to their drivers.
>
> But, as long as _someone_ is pushing it to stable,
> it is fine by me.
>
> Thanks,
> Ben
I will take care of the stable submission's Ben.
Cheers,
Jeff
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists