lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20120430.210335.1697570355622765079.davem@davemloft.net> Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 21:03:35 -0400 (EDT) From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> To: benh@...nel.crashing.org Cc: kaffeemonster@...glemail.com, eric.dumazet@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [REGRESSION][PATCH V4 3/3] bpf jit: Let the powerpc jit handle negative offsets From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org> Date: Tue, 01 May 2012 10:26:27 +1000 > I don't see a good way to sort that out other than introducing a new > kernel-side structure, change the sockopt number, and support the old > one as backward binary compat, but that's gross. First there are no padding issues, compat or otherwise. Second, there is no reason to add a new data-structure. Just make them use the right one, sock_fprog, if they are making the socket option call themselves. I can't believe this discussion is still going on, there is nothing to talk about. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists