lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1335877757.26217.67.camel@joe2Laptop> Date: Tue, 01 May 2012 06:09:17 -0700 From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: add a prefetch in socket backlog processing On Tue, 2012-05-01 at 14:29 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote: > On Tue, 2012-05-01 at 04:52 -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > > > That's true for cpus with sufficient cache but prefetch > > might be wasteful for cpus without (like some ARMs). > > > > Some of the sk_backlog_rcv functions like tcp_v4_do_rcv > > can be relatively large. > > You speak of icache here. Thats different matter. > > My patch does a prefetch of data (dcache) Actually I meant cpus with an integrated cache like the old arm 710 and the sh3/7710. I think those are still possible compilation targets, but perhaps no one cares anymore. > How this prefetch() is different than other ones in kernel ? I'm not suggesting prefetch isn't useful. If prefetch improves performance for the general case it's good. If the prefetch can also be trivially compile time wrapped to not impact older supported targets, I think that's good too. > For old cpus, you can use linux 2.4 it works much better. Deprecating older targets may not be a bad thing either. cheers, Joe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists