netdev - Re: batostr() function

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120508143011.GD29352@aemeltch-MOBL1>
Date:	Tue, 8 May 2012 17:30:12 +0300
From:	Andrei Emeltchenko <andrei.emeltchenko.news@...il.com>
To:	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Cc:	David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@...glemail.com>,
	linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: batostr() function

On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 04:25:08PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-05-08 at 15:30 +0200, David Herrmann wrote:
> > Hi Johannes
> > 
> > On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 1:49 PM, Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net> wrote:
> > > Really? 2 static buffers that are used alternately based on a static
> > > variable? How can that possibly be thread-safe? That may work in very
> > > restricted scenarios, but ...
> > 
> > Looking at "git blame" it seems the whole function is still from
> > linux-2.4. Looks like no-one ever noticed. I've sent a patchset fixing
> > it, thanks.
> 
> I was thinking you could use %pM, but it seems BT addresses are stored
> the wrong way around for some reason ...

This looks like better idea then allocating buffers, we can use swap to
take care about "wrong order".

Best regards 
Andrei Emeltchenko 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html