[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1336499313.4320.4.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net>
Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 19:48:33 +0200
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: Andrei Emeltchenko <andrei.emeltchenko.news@...il.com>,
David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@...glemail.com>,
linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...il.com>
Subject: Re: batostr() function
On Tue, 2012-05-08 at 10:18 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-05-08 at 17:30 +0300, Andrei Emeltchenko wrote:
> > On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 04:25:08PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2012-05-08 at 15:30 +0200, David Herrmann wrote:
> > > > Hi Johannes
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 1:49 PM, Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net> wrote:
> > > > > Really? 2 static buffers that are used alternately based on a static
> > > > > variable? How can that possibly be thread-safe? That may work in very
> > > > > restricted scenarios, but ...
> > > >
> > > > Looking at "git blame" it seems the whole function is still from
> > > > linux-2.4. Looks like no-one ever noticed. I've sent a patchset fixing
> > > > it, thanks.
> > >
> > > I was thinking you could use %pM, but it seems BT addresses are stored
> > > the wrong way around for some reason ...
> >
> > This looks like better idea then allocating buffers, we can use swap to
> > take care about "wrong order".
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/12/3/358
Pretty much what I had in mind, thanks. Luis, you'll notice that this
will be a pain to backport in compat. :-)
johannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists