netdev - Re: [PATCH 13/25] ipvs: remove check for IP_VS_CONN_F_SYNC from ip_vs_bind

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20120507.221742.778683822772023608.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Mon, 07 May 2012 22:17:42 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	jengelh@...i.de
Cc:	pablo@...filter.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/25] ipvs: remove check for IP_VS_CONN_F_SYNC from
 ip_vs_bind_dest

From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...i.de>
Date: Tue, 8 May 2012 04:15:15 +0200 (CEST)

> On Tuesday 2012-05-08 03:36, David Miller wrote:
> 
>>From: pablo@...filter.org
>>Date: Tue,  8 May 2012 02:22:07 +0200
>>
>>> +		/* It is a normal connection, so modify the counters
>>> +		 * according to the flags, later the protocol can
>>> +		 * update them on state change */
>>
>>Rather:
>>
>>		/* It is a normal connection, so modify the counters
>>		 * according to the flags, later the protocol can
>>		 * update them on state change
>>		 */
> 
> Well, CodingStyle even says

We've discussed this to death, subsystem maintainers can ask
for whatever they want and this is what I've asked for for years.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html