netdev - Re: [PATCH] net: compare_ether_addr[

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1336458936.29640.2.camel@joe2Laptop>
Date:	Mon, 07 May 2012 23:35:36 -0700
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	johannes@...solutions.net, eric.dumazet@...il.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: compare_ether_addr[_64bits]() has no ordering

On Tue, 2012-05-08 at 02:26 -0400, David Miller wrote:
> From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
> Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 07:25:44 +0200
> 
> > I suppose I could fix those first and then later change the type, but I
> > think having a "compare_ether_addr" function that returns *false* when
> > they *match* would be rather confusing. I'd rather have
> > "equal_ether_addr()" that returns *true* when they match.
> > 
> > I guess we could introduce equal_ether_addr() though and slowly convert,
> > keeping compare_ether_addr() as a sort of wrapper around it.
> 
> Indeed, this is one way to proceed.

perhaps is_equal_ether_addr or is_same_ether_addr instead?


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html