[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9BBC4E0CF881AA4299206E2E1412B6261884D53C@ORSMSX102.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 23:02:48 +0000
From: "Wyborny, Carolyn" <carolyn.wyborny@...el.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
"Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"gospo@...hat.com" <gospo@...hat.com>,
"sassmann@...hat.com" <sassmann@...hat.com>
Subject: RE: [net-next 2/2] igb: Add Support for new i210/i211 devices.
>-----Original Message-----
>From: David Miller [mailto:davem@...emloft.net]
>Sent: Friday, May 11, 2012 3:28 PM
>To: Kirsher, Jeffrey T
>Cc: Wyborny, Carolyn; netdev@...r.kernel.org; gospo@...hat.com;
>sassmann@...hat.com
>Subject: Re: [net-next 2/2] igb: Add Support for new i210/i211 devices.
>
>From: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
>Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 01:01:22 -0700
>
>> +s32 igb_acquire_nvm_i210(struct e1000_hw *hw)
>> +{
>> + s32 ret_val;
>> +
>> + ret_val = igb_acquire_swfw_sync_i210(hw, E1000_SWFW_EEP_SM);
>> +
>> + return ret_val;
>> +}
>
>Please, this is just unnecessary syntactic masterbation, simplify this
>to:
>
>s32 igb_acquire_nvm_i210(struct e1000_hw *hw)
>{
> return igb_acquire_swfw_sync_i210(hw, E1000_SWFW_EEP_SM);
>}
>
>And:
>
>> +void igb_release_nvm_i210(struct e1000_hw *hw)
>> +{
>> +
>> + igb_release_swfw_sync_i210(hw, E1000_SWFW_EEP_SM);
>> +}
>
>Please get rid of that unnecessary empty line.
>
>I can really tell when someone is extremely careless when removing
>their debugging code, and I can almost guarentee that's what has
>happened here.
Yes, you're right. Will fix ASAP.
Carolyn
Carolyn Wyborny
Linux Development
LAN Access Division
Intel Corporation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists