[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120514164230.6b9078bd@rainbow.cbg.collabora.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 16:42:30 +0100
From: Alban Crequy <alban.crequy@...labora.co.uk>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...i.de>
Cc: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
Vincent Sanders <vincent.sanders@...labora.co.uk>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@...labora.co.uk>,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] netfilter: don't assume NFPROTO_* are like PF_*
Le Mon, 14 May 2012 17:09:54 +0200 (CEST),
Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...i.de> a écrit :
>
> On Monday 2012-05-14 15:58, Alban Crequy wrote:
> >--- a/include/linux/netfilter.h
> >+++ b/include/linux/netfilter.h
> >@@ -62,11 +62,11 @@ enum nf_inet_hooks {
> >
> > enum {
> > NFPROTO_UNSPEC = 0,
> >- NFPROTO_IPV4 = 2,
> >- NFPROTO_ARP = 3,
> >- NFPROTO_BRIDGE = 7,
> >- NFPROTO_IPV6 = 10,
> >- NFPROTO_DECNET = 12,
> >+ NFPROTO_IPV4,
> >+ NFPROTO_ARP,
> >+ NFPROTO_BRIDGE,
> >+ NFPROTO_IPV6,
> >+ NFPROTO_DECNET,
> > NFPROTO_NUMPROTO,
> > };
>
> This must not be changed under any circumstances. It is exported to
> and used by userspace. (Except perhaps for NFPROTO_DECNET, which
> refers to a quite dead protocol that I think no user parts have ever
> used NFPROTO_DECNET.) I would consider it acceptable to change the
> value for NFPROTO_DECNET if Pablo joins.
Thanks for the review. I didn't realize it was exported to and used by
userspace. I would drop this patch then.
Alban
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists