[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120514191456.GC17086@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 22:14:56 +0300
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ian.Campbell@...rix.com,
kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] tun: experimental zero copy tx support
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 09:02:26PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-05-14 at 20:04 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 09:54:46AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > > On Sun, 13 May 2012 18:52:06 +0300
> > > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > + /* Userspace may produce vectors with count greater than
> > > > + * MAX_SKB_FRAGS, so we need to linearize parts of the skb
> > > > + * to let the rest of data to be fit in the frags.
> > > > + */
> > > Rather than complex partial code, just go through slow path for
> > > requests with too many frags (or for really small requests).
> > > Creating mixed skb's seems too easy to get wrong.
> >
> > I don't object in principle but macvtap has same code
> > so seems better to stay consistent.
> >
>
> If I remember well, code in vtap was buggy and still is.
>
> Jason Wang fixes are not yet in,
They seem to be in net-next, or did I miss something?
> so maybe wait a bit, so that we dont
> add a pile of new bugs ?
>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists