[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <C8A6796DE7C66C4ABCBC18106CB6C1CC164B83BE12@ESESSCMS0356.eemea.ericsson.se>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 09:33:17 +0200
From: Hans Schillström <hans.schillstrom@...csson.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...i.de>
CC: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
"kaber@...sh.net" <kaber@...sh.net>,
"jengelh@...ozas.de" <jengelh@...ozas.de>,
"netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org" <netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"dan.carpenter@...cle.com" <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
"hans@...illstrom.com" <hans@...illstrom.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] netfilter: xt_HMARK: endian bugs
On Mon, 2012-05-14 at 17:05 +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On Monday 2012-05-14 16:40, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
>
> >> - if (t->uports.p16.dst < t->uports.p16.src)
> >> + if (ntohs(t->uports.p16.dst) < ntohs(t->uports.p16.src))
> >
> >Do we really need this to make sparse happy?
>
This looks insane to make sparse happy
static inline u32 addr_mask(const __be32 *addr32, const __be32 *mask)
{
return (__force u32)htonl((__force u32)(*addr32 & *mask));
}
with the "more logic" way to write it sparse complains on everything...
static inline u32 addr_mask(const __be32 *addr32, const __be32 *mask)
{
return htonl(*addr32 & *mask);
}
Is there a better way to do this ?--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists