netdev - Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] net: sh

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 15 May 2012 18:46:25 +0900
From:	"Shimoda, Yoshihiro" <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] net: sh_eth: use NAPI

2012/05/15 14:07, David Miller wrote:
> From: "Shimoda, Yoshihiro" <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>
> Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 13:47:44 +0900
> 
>> 2012/05/15 7:50, David Miller wrote:
>>> You need strict synchronization between your TX queueing and TX
>>> liberation flows.  So that queue stop and wake are only performed
>>> at the correct moment.
>>
>> I will add netif_queue_stopped() in the sh_eth_poll().
> 
> That doesn't fix the bug.  What if someone transmits a packet and
> fills the TX queue between the netif_queue_stopped() test and the
> call to netif_wake_queue()?
> 
> Adding another test doesn't create the necessary synchronization.
> 

Thank you for the reply again.
I will modify the code as the following. Is it correct?

	if (txfree_num) {
		netif_tx_lock(ndev);
		if (netif_queue_stopped(ndev))
			netif_wake_queue(ndev);
		netif_tx_unlock(ndev);
	}

Best regards,
Yoshihiro Shimoda
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html