[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1337100630.8220.4.camel@oc3660625478.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 09:50:30 -0700
From: Shirley Ma <mashirle@...ibm.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Cc: eric.dumazet@...il.com, mst@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [V2 PATCH 9/9] vhost: zerocopy: poll vq in zerocopy callback
On Wed, 2012-05-02 at 11:42 +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> We add used and signal guest in worker thread but did not poll the
> virtqueue
> during the zero copy callback. This may lead the missing of adding and
> signalling during zerocopy. Solve this by polling the virtqueue and
> let it
> wakeup the worker during callback.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
> ---
> drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 1 +
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> index 947f00d..7b75fdf 100644
> --- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> +++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> @@ -1604,6 +1604,7 @@ void vhost_zerocopy_callback(void *arg)
> struct vhost_ubuf_ref *ubufs = ubuf->arg;
> struct vhost_virtqueue *vq = ubufs->vq;
>
> + vhost_poll_queue(&vq->poll);
> /* set len = 1 to mark this desc buffers done DMA */
> vq->heads[ubuf->desc].len = VHOST_DMA_DONE_LEN;
> kref_put(&ubufs->kref, vhost_zerocopy_done_signal);
Doing so, we might have redundant vhost_poll_queue(). Do you know in
which scenario there might be missing of adding and signaling during
zerocopy?
Thanks
Shirley
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists