netdev - Re: [PATCH/RFC net-next 0/4] Delete token ring support.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20120515.210020.1631343759962418692.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Tue, 15 May 2012 21:00:20 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	andi@...stfloor.org
Cc:	paul.gortmaker@...driver.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	schwidefsky@...ibm.com, heiko.carstens@...ibm.com,
	linux390@...ibm.com, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC net-next 0/4] Delete token ring support.

From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 17:48:15 -0700

> Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com> writes:
>>
>> What I mean by (2) is the implicit absence of anyone fixing _runtime_
>> bugs, going all the way back to 2.6.12 in 2005.  If the code was being
>> _used_, we'd see runtime regressions reported and their associated
>> fixes.
> 
> Removal sounds good to me. In fact I would argue to remove any other driver
> which did not get a real change since 2005 too.

I also support removing the token ring stuff, and in fact I'm more
than happy to add your patch set to the net-next tree right now.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html