[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120516151615.GA30195@hmsreliant.think-freely.org>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 11:16:15 -0400
From: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drop_monitor: convert to modular building
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 04:48:01PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-05-16 at 10:27 -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> > When I first wrote drop monitor I wrote it to just build monolithically. There
> > is no reason it can't be built modularly as well, so lets give it that
> > flexibiity.
>
> > + for_each_present_cpu(cpu) {
> > + data = &per_cpu(dm_cpu_data, cpu);
> > + del_timer(&data->send_timer);
> > + cancel_work_sync(&data->dm_alert_work);
> > + /*
> > + * At this point, we should have exclusive access
> > + * to this struct and can free the skb inside it
> > + */
> > + kfree_skb(data->skb);
> > + }
> > +
>
> I dont think for_each_present_cpu(cpu) is right
>
> (I realize drop_monitor already uses this, but its a bug)
>
> To use it, you must have a notifier to react to cpu HOTPLUG events.
>
> -> for_each_possible_cpu() is more correct.
>
Ok, i can do that.
> Also, please dont add new printk(KERN_WARNING ...), use pr_warn(...)
> instead
>
Ack, I'll add a patch to this series to convert the existing printks to their
corresponding pr_* macros
Neil
>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists