[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <4FB30FFB.6090708@renesas.com>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 11:24:59 +0900
From: "Shimoda, Yoshihiro" <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>
To: Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-sh@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] net: sh_eth: use NAPI
2012/05/16 3:29, Francois Romieu wrote:
> David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> :
>> From: "Shimoda, Yoshihiro" <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>
> [...]
>>> I will modify the code as the following. Is it correct?
>>>
>>> if (txfree_num) {
>>> netif_tx_lock(ndev);
>>> if (netif_queue_stopped(ndev))
>>> netif_wake_queue(ndev);
>>> netif_tx_unlock(ndev);
>>> }
>>
>> Yes, and then you don't need that private lock in the start_xmit()
>> method at all, since that method runs with the tx_lock held.
>
> I agree that the lock should go but:
> 1. something must be done to prevent sh_eth_txfree() being called
> at the same time from the xmit and poll handlers
> 2. while netif_tx locking above provides an implicit memory barrier,
> there won't be one in sh_eth_start_xmit once the lock is removed.
> mdp->dirty_tx changes may thus go unnoticed in sh_eth_start_xmit
>
Thank you for the review.
I checked tg3.c, and I found a patch to fix the race condition:
commit ID 1b2a72050 : [TG3]: Fix tx race condition
I will check the patch, and I will write such a patch for the sh_eth
driver later.
Best regards,
Yoshihiro Shimoda
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists