netdev - Re: [PATCH 0/3] net: mac80211: Neaten debugging

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 16 May 2012 09:59:31 +0200
From:	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	joe@...ches.com, linville@...driver.com,
	linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] net: mac80211: Neaten debugging

On Wed, 2012-05-16 at 01:23 -0400, David Miller wrote:
> From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
> Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 14:20:29 -0700
> 
> > Always use pr_debug variants instead of printk(KERN_DEBUG...)
> > 
> > Joe Perches (3):
> >   net: mac80211: Convert printk(KERN_DEBUG to pr_debug
> >   net: mac80211: Add and use ht_vdbg debugging macro
> >   net: mac80211: Add and use ibss_vdbg debugging macro
> 
> I really think this is the right thing to do and I hope the wireless
> folks integrate this.
> 
> I am well aware that you guys intend for some of these messages to be
> indications and notifications the user is intended to SEE, but in the
> cases where that is true KERN_DEBUG is absolutely not appropriate.
> 
> You should be using KERN_INFO or KERN_WARN in those situations
> instead.

Yeah, makes sense. I wonder if it makes sense to leave these under
#ifdef though? Why #ifdef something if it's going to be invisible most
of the time anyway?

johannes

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html