netdev - Re: Stable regression with 'tcp: allow splice() to build full TSO packets'

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120517215437.GQ14498@1wt.eu>
Date:	Thu, 17 May 2012 23:54:37 +0200
From:	Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Stable regression with 'tcp: allow splice() to build full TSO packets'

On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 11:40:22PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp.c b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
> > index 63ddaee..231fe53 100644
> > --- a/net/ipv4/tcp.c
> > +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
> > @@ -917,8 +917,7 @@ new_segment:
> >  wait_for_sndbuf:
> >  		set_bit(SOCK_NOSPACE, &sk->sk_socket->flags);
> >  wait_for_memory:
> > -		if (copied)
> > -			tcp_push(sk, flags & ~MSG_MORE, mss_now, TCP_NAGLE_PUSH);
> > +		tcp_push(sk, flags & ~MSG_MORE, mss_now, TCP_NAGLE_PUSH);
> >  
> >  		if ((err = sk_stream_wait_memory(sk, &timeo)) != 0)
> >  			goto do_error;
> 
> 
> I dont understand why we should tcp_push() if we sent 0 bytes in this
> splice() call.
> 
> The push() should have be done already by prior splice() call, dont you
> think ?
> 
> out:
> 	if (copied && !(flags & MSG_SENDPAGE_NOTLAST))
> 		tcp_push(sk, flags, mss_now, tp->nonagle);
> 

I do think so, but my guess is that something fails below us at some point.
I tracked the tcp_push() chain down to tcp_write_xmit() which I *think* might
fail. I'm not certain about the conditions which can make this happen though.
However what I'm almost sure is that if we fail one tcp_write_xmit() from a
call to tcp_push(), next time we come here in do_tcp_sendpages(), the buffers
won't have moved and this second splice() will immediately go to out with
copied == 0.

Maybe I just worked around the consequence of a deeper issue and something
else needs to enable tcp_push() when we fail, but it's not very clear to me.
I felt like the call to tcp_check_probe_timer() in __tcp_push_pending_frames()
is there for this purpose, but I'm not sure.

Willy

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html