[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1337354484.7029.42.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 17:21:24 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: "Berg, Johannes" <johannes.berg@...el.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"Guy, Wey-Yi W" <wey-yi.w.guy@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next] iwlwifi: dont pull too much payload in skb
head
On Fri, 2012-05-18 at 14:59 +0000, Berg, Johannes wrote:
> > Since merge window is now pretty close, I would prefer David applies this
> > directly in net-next, if you dont mind, as this patch is more a core network issue
> > than an iwlwifi one.
> >
> > Thanks !
>
> Sure, good with me, I don't think we have colliding patches.
>
> Reviewed-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>
Thanks
> We may want to move this code into mac80211 later though since it also
> has an if (pull in everything, even reallocating if necessary, if it's
> a management frame), but that can wait, I think we're the only driver
> using paged RX.
This is OK, these frames wont be injected in linux IP/TCP stack.
Or maybe you would like an optimized version of skb_header_pointer(),
avoiding the copy if the whole blob can be part of _one_ fragment ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists