netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH net-next] hp100: delete VG/AnyLAN hp100

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120518192808.GA19446@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com>
Date:	Fri, 18 May 2012 21:28:08 +0200
From:	Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>
To:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:	Joel Soete <soete.joel@...rlet.be>,
	Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, JBottomley@...allels.com,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next] hp100: delete VG/AnyLAN hp100

Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> :
[...]
> I saw people using TR adapters with Linux as of 2008/9.
> 
> That doesn't mean it's common or make it desirable to
> keep TR in the current kernel tree though.

I'll leave token ring PCI drivers where they are for now.

> Is VG/AnyLAN different?

Your own word: "unused". I see nothing wrong asking users if they
still care. If no one cares about the hp100, fine.

-- 
Ueimor
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html