[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120519.005137.1933841560668190190.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 00:51:37 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: dan.carpenter@...cle.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: inconsistent null checking in ipx_ioctl()
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 23:56:18 +0300
> Hi, I'm working on some new Smatch stuff and going through some warnings
> in old code.
>
> ----
> This is a semi-automatic email about new static checker warnings.
>
> The patch b0d0d915d1d1: "ipx: remove the BKL" from Jan 25, 2011,
> leads to the following Smatch complaint:
>
> net/ipx/af_ipx.c:1928 ipx_ioctl()
> error: we previously assumed 'sk' could be null (see line 1913)
Thanks Dan, I've commited the following:
--------------------
ipx: Remove spurious NULL checking in ipx_ioctl().
We already unconditionally dereference 'sk' via lock_sock(sk) earlier
in this function, and our caller (sock_do_ioctl()) makes takes similar
liberties.
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
---
net/ipx/af_ipx.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipx/af_ipx.c b/net/ipx/af_ipx.c
index 824d4a3..dfd6faa 100644
--- a/net/ipx/af_ipx.c
+++ b/net/ipx/af_ipx.c
@@ -1901,9 +1901,7 @@ static int ipx_ioctl(struct socket *sock, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
(const unsigned short __user *)argp);
break;
case SIOCGSTAMP:
- rc = -EINVAL;
- if (sk)
- rc = sock_get_timestamp(sk, argp);
+ rc = sock_get_timestamp(sk, argp);
break;
case SIOCGIFDSTADDR:
case SIOCSIFDSTADDR:
--
1.7.10.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists